ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Mural Unicystic Ameloblastoma in a 62-Year-Old Patient Mimicking Conventional Ameloblastoma: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mural Unicystic Ameloblastoma in a 62-Year-Old Patient Mimicking Conventional Ameloblastoma: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unicystic ameloblastoma is a cystic variant of ameloblastoma that may clinically and radiographically mimic odontogenic cysts and, in some cases, conventional ameloblastoma. The mural subtype is characterized by ameloblastomatous epithelial infiltration of the fibrous cyst wall and may demonstrate more aggressive biological behavior than other unicystic variants. This report describes a mural unicystic ameloblastoma in a 62-year-old male presenting with a long-standing painless swelling of the left mandible. Cone-beam computed tomography demonstrated a well-defined radiolucent lesion measuring approximately 47 × 25 mm with marked buccolingual expansion, internal septations producing a multiloculated appearance, and focal buccal cortical perforation. Incisional biopsy established the diagnosis of ameloblastoma without definitive subclassification. Segmental mandibular resection was subsequently performed because of the lesion's radiographic extent and cortical perforation. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen demonstrated a true cystic lesion lined by ameloblastomatous odontogenic epithelium with extensive intraluminal plexiform epithelial proliferation and multiple ameloblastomatous epithelial islands infiltrating the fibrous cyst wall, confirming mural unicystic ameloblastoma. Despite these findings, preservation of the underlying cystic architecture supported the diagnosis of mural unicystic ameloblastoma rather than predominantly solid ameloblastoma with secondary cystic degeneration. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of unicystic ameloblastoma in lesions demonstrating multiloculated radiographic appearance, cortical perforation, and extensive intraluminal and mural proliferation, and emphasizes the importance of adequate histopathological sampling and clinicopathological correlation for accurate subclassification and surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.