ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Severe Metallosis after Tumor Mega-Prosthesis: Revise or Retain? - A Case Series.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tumor mega-prostheses are widely used for limb salvage following resection of bone tumors. Although infection and aseptic loosening are the most common causes of failure, metallosis secondary to structural failure is uncommon and may mimic other complications. We describe a case series of two cases of severe metallosis following tumor mega-prosthesis reconstruction. Case Report: The first case involved a 34-year-old man who presented with valgus deformity, pain, and restricted knee motion 3 years after proximal tibial reconstruction for a giant cell tumor. Inflammatory markers were normal, and radiographs showed no loosening or implant breakage. Surgical exploration revealed extensive metallosis caused by polyethylene bushing failure of the hinge mechanism. Radical debridement and isolated bushing exchange restored alignment and function while preserving well-fixed components. A second case involved a 24-year-old man with pain in the leg 2 years after distal tibial replacement for osteosarcoma. Radiographs demonstrated osteolysis and stem loosening. However, markers of inflammation were within normal limits. This scenario raised concerns of possible infection or a structural failure. Intraoperatively, severe metallosis with implant loosening was identified. Extensive debridement and revision reconstruction with a longer cemented stem were performed. Conclusion: Metallosis is a rare but potentially devastating complication of tumor mega-prostheses reconstruction. Polyethylene bushing failure and implant loosening can result in metal-on-metal articulation and extensive tissue damage. Early recognition, exclusion of infection, and timely surgical intervention may permit limited revision and prevent catastrophic implant failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.