ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Direct Posterior Approach to Repairing Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Injury.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with tibial avulsion injuries commonly occur following high-energy trauma. While the posteromedial approach is traditionally favored for fixation, emerging evidence suggests that a direct posterior approach may be a safe and effective alternative for select fracture patterns. Case Report: We report the case of a 26-year-old polytrauma patient with no significant prior medical or surgical history who presented after a motorcycle accident with a PCL tibial avulsion injury resulting in posterolateral and tibial intercondylar eminence fracture with a central articular posterior rim involvement. We performed a direct posterior approach, as described by Abbott-Carpenter. Fixation was achieved with FiberWire sutures for the ligamentous avulsion and cannulated screws for the bony fragments. The post-operative recovery was notable for a transient tibial nerve neuropraxia that resolved before discharge, and the patient progressed well in rehabilitation with favorable clinical outcomes at follow-up. Conclusion: PCL tibial avulsion injuries associated with posterior rim fracture commonly result from hyperflexion mechanisms, classically described as dashboard-type injuries. The fracture morphology and ligamentous involvement determine the optimal surgical approach. This case highlights a less commonly reported fixation strategy using FiberWire sutures and cannulated screws through a direct posterior approach. Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence that the direct posterior approach to repairing PCL tibial avulsion injury is safe and effective with minimal complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.