The iCREATE registry: a model for strengthening injury surveillance in Republic of Moldova.

Introduction: Injuries represent a major public health issue, causing approximately 16,000 deaths globally each day (10% of all deaths), which is 32% more than the combined total caused by malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS. Over the past 15 years, the WHO and regional initiatives have supported the piloting of trauma registries in low- and middle-income countries as essential tools for monitoring, planning, and prevention. Objective: This article aims to assess the feasibility and utility of implementing a national trauma registry in the Republic of Moldova, in order to improve injury surveillance and emergency service planning. Materials and methods: In 2018, the pilot iCREATE trauma registry was tested for the first time in three countries: Moldova, Armenia, and Georgia. The data collection instrument was developed based on WHO recommendations, ICD-10, and IDB-JAMIE standards, under the guidance of partners from the University of Iowa and Babes Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca. All trauma cases from the Institute of Emergency Medicine and the Results: The analyzed sample consists of 7,942 individuals, predominantly male (57.3%). The most represented age groups were 19-29 years (17.8%) and 30-39 years (17.6%), while individuals aged 70 and above accounted for 11% of the total. Most incidents occurred in urban areas (76.9%). Of the total patients, 52.4% were treated and discharged, while 37.5% required hospitalization. Injuries occurred primarily at home (55.4%) and on public roads (24.7%). The leading mechanism of injury was falls (68.2%), followed by other causes (12.2%) and cut/pierce injuries (10.0%). The most frequently affected body regions were the head/skull (12.5%) and knee (11.8%), followed by the hip (6.7%) and wrist (6.4%). Fractures were the most common injury type (34.5%), followed by contusions (23.0%) and open wounds (14.7%). Several gaps in data collection and reporting were identified and should be considered in future efforts to enhance trauma surveillance. Conclusions: The data highlight the need to develop a national trauma registry as an essential tool for monitoring, prevention, and effective intervention, alongside health promotion campaigns targeting vulnerable groups and the involvement of relevant stakeholders.