Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428330›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2026

Prevalence, causes, management strategies, and outcomes of secondary interventions during long-term follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair: a retrospective cohort study.

Hyo Jun Kim, Hyung Sub Park, Jinsol Jung, Ji Young Lee, Myung Yup Hyun, Jonghyuk Park, Taeseung Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyo Jun KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-6391
Hyung Sub ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8748-5925
Jinsol JungDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-8057
Ji Young LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6622-8610
Myung Yup HyunDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2316-8081
Jonghyuk ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3898-313X
Taeseung LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-5924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence, causes, management strategies, and outcomes of secondary interventions after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in a Korean cohort. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients who underwent standard EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between 2008 and 2023. Clinical and anatomical parameters were analyzed. Secondary intervention indications, management, and outcomes were documented. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated freedom from intervention and survival, and Cox regression identified predictors of mortality. Results: During a mean follow-up of 61.4 ± 45.8 months, 54 patients (22.3%) underwent 70 secondary interventions. The most common indications were Type II endoleaks with sac growth (24.1%), graft limb occlusion/stenosis (20.4%), Type IB endoleaks (11.1%), and Type III endoleaks (9.3%). Type II endoleaks were primarily treated with transarterial embolization, but many required repeated interventions or open conversion. Type I and III endoleaks were managed with stent graft extensions, endoanchors, or revision EVAR. Freedom from secondary intervention was 73.3% at 5 years and 57.5% at 10 years. Aneurysm-related survival was high (95.3% at 10 years), but overall survival declined to 42.5%, mainly due to comorbidities like malignancy, pneumonia, and cardiovascular disease. Multivariate analysis identified age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hospital stay, and aneurysm diameter as independent mortality predictors, with dyslipidemia being protective. Conclusion: Secondary interventions after EVAR were required in over 20% of patients, primarily for Type II endoleaks. While aneurysm-related survival remained high, overall survival was limited by comorbidities. Lifelong imaging surveillance and management of comorbidities are essential for optimizing EVAR outcomes.

Indexed as

Abdominal aortic aneurysmEndoleakEndovascular proceduresReoperationTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID42428330
PMCPMC13347101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.