Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428324›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Kristen M Martinet, Cristian Román-Palacios, Luke J Harmon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristen M MartinetCollege of Information Science University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-9507
Cristian Román-PalaciosCollege of Information Science University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1696-4886
Luke J HarmonDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Idaho Moscow Idaho USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4985-5750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A universal method of examining patterns of biodiversity on islands is the species-area relationship (SAR). SARs quantify the relationship between species richness (the number of species) and the area of the land mass on which they occur. An extension of the SAR, the speciation-area relationship (SpAR), quantifies the relationship between speciation rate and area. Comparing these relationships across island systems globally is a difficult task because gathering and processing a large amount of species occurrence and island data often requires researchers to conduct lengthy literature searches and combine datasets from several different sources. We present

Indexed as

biodiversityisland biogeographyspeciation‐area relationshipspecies‐area relationship

Identifiers

PMID42428324
PMCPMC13345990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.