ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Guild Structure in Coral Reef Fishes Does Not Conform to Competitive Exclusion-Based Assembly Rules.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coral reef fish communities are species-rich with seemingly high apparent niche overlap. Although competition among fish species is well documented at local scales and within specific species, the extent to which it affects community structure and composition remains unclear. Here, we examine whether competition-based models of community assembly can explain patterns of species occurrences within feeding guilds in a lagoonal reef fish metacommunity at One Tree Island on the southern Great Barrier Reef, and thus infer whether competitive exclusion is operating within guilds. Using presence-absence data from underwater fish surveys, we partitioned the fish community into feeding guilds and applied null-model analyses to test for evidence of competition using two classical assembly rules: Diamond's co-occurrence rule and Wilson's guild proportionality rule. Neither assembly-rule prediction was supported. Species within guilds co-occurred as frequently or more frequently than expected under null expectations, and guild composition varied more, rather than less, across sites. These results indicate that exclusion-based assembly rules do not provide a strong description of guild-level structure in this system and highlight the limits of extrapolating evidence of local competitive interactions to patterns of community assembly in species-rich communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.