ArticleContemporary clinical dentistry
Nonsurgical Retreatment of a Mandibular Molar with Internal Resorption and a Separated Endodontic Instrument Deep within the Body of the Mandible.
Article in Contemporary clinical dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fracture of an endodontic instrument during an endodontic procedure is a common complication, but displacement of the separated instrument either inside or by the side of the inferior alveolar canal is very rare. This case report presents nonsurgical retreatment of a symptomatic, previously endodontically treated mandibular left first molar tooth with internal root resorption. The unique feature of this case report is the presence of a separated endodontic instrument entirely beyond the root apex and located deep within the body of the mandible. Under rubber dam isolation, access cavity preparation was carried out, and previous root canal obturating materials were removed. Intracanal dressing with calcium hydroxide was placed for two visits, and in the subsequent visit, the root canals were obturated. The periapical lesion healed at 24 months of follow-up. The separated endodontic instrument was monitored regularly through clinical and radiographic examinations, and the patient remained asymptomatic during this period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.