ArticleCureus2026
Transforming Crisis Airway Management: Clinical Applications of a Distal Pharyngeal Airway Innovation in Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Airway management failure remains one of the most consequential adverse events in clinical practice, with the potential for severe hypoxemia, cardiac arrest, and death. While traditional airway adjuncts, such as oropharyngeal airways (OPAs) and nasopharyngeal airways (NPAs), serve as foundational rescue tools, their limitations, including the inability to access distal pharyngeal obstructions, risk of laryngospasm, and incompatibility with positive pressure ventilation, underscore the need for innovative solutions. The distal pharyngeal airway (DPA) is a relatively novel device designed to extend beyond the tongue base to the level of the epiglottis, addressing the most common anatomic site of upper airway obstruction. We present two cases that demonstrate the lifesaving utility of the DPA in high-acuity airway emergencies. The first case describes a 47-year-old male with a BMI of 46, a history of obstructive sleep apnea and multiple comorbidities, who experienced rapid oxygen desaturation to 60% during procedural sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The jaw thrust maneuver proved ineffective; insertion of the DPA device through the endoscopic bite block aperture with bag-valve-mask ventilation restored oxygen saturation within 30 seconds, and the procedure was completed successfully. The second case involves a 69-year-old female who presented in acute respiratory distress following thyroid lobectomy, with a postoperative hematoma causing tracheal displacement and complete obliteration of anterior neck landmarks. Sequential failed attempts with two video laryngoscopes and a supraglottic airway resulted in oxygen saturation declining to 60%. DPA placement with two-person assisted mask ventilation successfully restored ventilation and oxygenation, bridging the patient to definitive airway management and subsequent video laryngoscopy-assisted intubation with a bougie. These cases highlight the DPA as an effective rescue device in both procedural and emergency airway settings, particularly when conventional adjuncts fail. Early recognition of high-risk scenarios, systematic decision-making, team coordination, and access to innovative devices such as the DPA are essential to optimizing patient safety and outcomes across diverse clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.