Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428167›Full record

ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2026

Factors associated with successful removable partial denture treatment: an analysis of clinical outcomes and post-insertion events.

Navodika Yaparathna, Ruvini Hattiarachchi, Iresha Udayamalee, Chamilka Bandaranayake, Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla, Steve An, Menaka Abuzar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Navodika YaparathnaSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2116-4382
Ruvini HattiarachchiCentre for the Business and Economics of Health, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3501-2645
Iresha UdayamaleeSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3399-1387
Chamilka BandaranayakeDepartment of Oral medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-1148
Santosh Kumar TadakamadlaDentistry and Oral Health, Department of Rural Clinical Sciences, La Trobe Rural Health School, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-2897
Steve AnSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6390-4443
Menaka AbuzarSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2723-0215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this research was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and esthetic outcomes of removable partial dentures (RPDs), as well as post-insertion events, and to identify the potential factors and their multifactorial interactions that influence overall RPD success, using real-world, evidence-based support better evidencebased clinical practice in RPD treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed using data from a university dental clinic's electronic patient management system. Ten outcomes and 23 variables related to patient, oral status, denture, and clinical process were assessed using bivariate tests and logistic regression.

resultsThe study included 317 patients aged 34 - 90 years (mean age 69.7), with most patients aged 56 - 75 years (53.63%). Significant predictors of RPD success included the arch receiving the prosthesis, the opposing arch configuration, and the number of post-insertion visits. Single-arch dentures showed higher success. Lower RPDs opposed by complete maxillary dentures and cases involving RPDs in both arches showed reduced success. Maxillary RPD success decreased as the number of missing maxillary teeth increased and more pre-insertion visits were required. The Kennedy classification influenced outcomes only in the maxilla, with Class II and III demonstrating higher success than Class I. No other assessed variables showed significant associations, although descriptive patterns suggested variation across age groups.

conclusionThese findings highlight the multifactorial nature of RPD success, the predictive value of post-insertion events, and the need to assess the maxilla and mandible both separately and together, as different factors influence success in each arch.

Indexed as

Kennedy classificationOutcomesPost-insertion eventsRemovable partial denturesSuccess

Identifiers

PMID42428167
PMCPMC13346852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.