ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2026
Factors associated with successful removable partial denture treatment: an analysis of clinical outcomes and post-insertion events.
Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this research was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and esthetic outcomes of removable partial dentures (RPDs), as well as post-insertion events, and to identify the potential factors and their multifactorial interactions that influence overall RPD success, using real-world, evidence-based support better evidencebased clinical practice in RPD treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed using data from a university dental clinic's electronic patient management system. Ten outcomes and 23 variables related to patient, oral status, denture, and clinical process were assessed using bivariate tests and logistic regression.
resultsThe study included 317 patients aged 34 - 90 years (mean age 69.7), with most patients aged 56 - 75 years (53.63%). Significant predictors of RPD success included the arch receiving the prosthesis, the opposing arch configuration, and the number of post-insertion visits. Single-arch dentures showed higher success. Lower RPDs opposed by complete maxillary dentures and cases involving RPDs in both arches showed reduced success. Maxillary RPD success decreased as the number of missing maxillary teeth increased and more pre-insertion visits were required. The Kennedy classification influenced outcomes only in the maxilla, with Class II and III demonstrating higher success than Class I. No other assessed variables showed significant associations, although descriptive patterns suggested variation across age groups.
conclusionThese findings highlight the multifactorial nature of RPD success, the predictive value of post-insertion events, and the need to assess the maxilla and mandible both separately and together, as different factors influence success in each arch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.