ReviewThe South African journal of physiotherapy2026
Exploration of lifestyle interventions for individuals with knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review.
Review in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a primary global cause of disability, with lifestyle interventions such as exercise and weight management serving as key conservative strategies. However, the diversity of these interventions and their assessment measures lack synthesis. Objectives: Our scoping review explored the range, characteristics and outcomes of lifestyle interventions for knee OA and identified the outcome measures used for assessment. Method: Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines and the Arksey and O'Malley framework, data were extracted from 36 studies, including 29 randomised controlled trials, two cohorts, three quasi-experimental studies, one qualitative study and one feasibility trial. Results: Across 4025 participants, interventions included physiotherapist-guided exercise, multicomponent programmes, digital eHealth platforms, aquatic training and dietary changes. While findings consistently showed improved physical function, reduced pain and enhanced quality of life, no single outcome measure was universally applied across all identified studies. Key barriers included low motivation, technical literacy and resource intensity. Conclusion: Lifestyle interventions are diverse and effective for improving clinical outcomes in knee OA. The absence of a standardised outcome measure highlights significant heterogeneity in how intervention efficacy is captured in research. Clinical Implications: These findings highlight the need for standardised, clinically meaningful outcome measures to improve comparability across studies and strengthen evidence synthesis. Greater consistency in how lifestyle interventions are evaluated will support translation into clinical practice and inform the design of future multicomponent programmes for individuals with knee OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.