Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428160›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2026

Physiotherapists' knowledge, attitude and practice of motor learning in stroke rehabilitation.

Elmi Meyer, Helena W Nel, Dineo Mahlangu, Riette Nel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elmi MeyerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5466-2811
Helena W NelDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1939-3989
Dineo MahlanguDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0031-3782
Riette NelDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3889-0438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To improve motor impairment in stroke survivors, physiotherapists are encouraged to structure exercise sessions in such a way that motor learning is optimised in stroke survivors. No studies have described the knowledge, attitudes or practices of South African physiotherapists regarding motor learning in stroke rehabilitation. Objectives: To describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices of South African physiotherapists regarding motor learning in stroke rehabilitation. Method: Convenient and snowball sampling techniques were used. Self-compiled questionnaires were sent to members of the South African Society of Physiotherapy (SASP) via an electronic survey platform. Results: Forty physiotherapists completed the survey. Respondents' main area of interest was spread widely: the most indicated area was neuromusculoskeletal physiotherapy ( Conclusion: The study revealed knowledge and practice gaps in several motor learning areas and inconsistent application of motor learning recommendations from the literature into stroke rehabilitation. Clinical implications: Findings highlight the need for further post-graduate training to allow physiotherapists to confidently apply motor learning principles in stroke rehabilitation.

Indexed as

attitudeknowledgemotor impairmentmotor learningpracticesurvey

Identifiers

PMID42428160
PMCPMC13347803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.