ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2026
Assessing school preparedness for disaster resilience: Integrating Gender, Disability, and Social Inclusion (GEDSI) in the safe school programme.
Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing school preparedness for disaster resilience: Integrating Gender, Disability, and Social Inclusion (GEDSI) in the safe school programme.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schools play a critical role in disaster risk reduction; however, preparedness efforts often overlook the unequal vulnerabilities associated with Gender, Disability, and Social Inclusion. This study addresses the lack of empirical evidence on how inclusively disaster preparedness is implemented within school-based disaster management structures, particularly the Safe School Disaster Unit (SSDU). Using a quantitative survey design, data were collected from senior high schools to assess levels of SSDU readiness, the integration of Gender, Disability, and Social Inclusion (GEDSI) principles and the relationship between these two dimensions. This study used a quantitative design. Data were collected through questionnaires from 995 respondents across five schools and analysed using regression analysis. The findings reveal substantial variation in preparedness across schools, with public schools generally demonstrating higher levels of SSDU readiness and GEDSI integration than private schools. Statistical analysis further indicates a positive association between stronger SSDU implementation and higher levels of GEDSI integration, suggesting that schools with more established disaster management systems are better positioned to adopt inclusive practices. These results highlight persistent gaps in inclusive disaster preparedness and underscore the need to strengthen institutional systems and policies that embed GEDSI principles within school disaster risk reduction initiatives. The study contributes empirical evidence to inform more equitable and resilient safe school programming. Contribution: Disaster risk reduction strategies in school environments have so far focused on physical and structural aspects, whereas, on the other hand, there are aspects that have not been studied, such as Gender, Disability, and Social Inclusion. Therefore, it is important to know the implementation of safe schools by focusing on aspects of Gender, Disability, and Social Inclusion in order to realise school resilience to disasters in a fair, equal and sustainable manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.