ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Consensus Recommendations for the Clinical Management of Wolfram syndrome Using a Delphi Method.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in Wolfram syndrome patients.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Wolfram syndrome is a rare neurodegenerative disorder, most commonly caused by pathogenic variants in Methods: An international steering committee systematically reviewed 273 peer-reviewed publications and generated draft consensus statements across six clinical domains. These statements were evaluated by international specialists in endocrinology, clinical genetics, neurology, ophthalmology and neuro-ophthalmology, psychiatry, and urology, drawn from North America, Europe, Latin America, Oceania, and Asia, using a modified three-round Delphi process. Additional feedback was incorporated from nurses specializing in multidisciplinary Wolfram syndrome care, from leaders of international patient organizations, and from specialists in the genetic diagnosis of monogenic diabetes. Structured feedback from patients and families was gathered through multiple international patient advocacy organizations. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. Results: All 35 final consensus statements reached the pre-specified consensus threshold of ≥80% agreement, spanning diagnosis and genetic testing, multidisciplinary care organization, neuro-ophthalmology, neurology, endocrinology, urology, gastroenterology, and psychiatry. Conclusions: These guidelines are the first international clinical consensus for Wolfram syndrome and provide actionable recommendations for clinicians worldwide. Implementation should be accompanied by a prospective audit to expand the evidence base and support future iterations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.