ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Subtyping and staging of Alzheimer's disease from routine structural MRI with PHASE-AD.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
48 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural MRI is routinely acquired in the clinical assessment of Alzheimer's disease, yet quantitative morphometric indices derived from these scans remain largely confined to research settings. Here we present PHASE-AD - a framework that translates such indices into clinically interpretable classifications of atrophy subtype and stage that jointly capture atrophy progression while accounting for inter-individual atrophy heterogeneity. PHASE-AD is trained on MRI scans from 8,415 participants and robustly captures limbic-predominant and hippocampal-sparing atrophy subtypes that were identified across seven independent datasets. Two cross-validation schemes revealed high robustness across different field strength and scanner manufacturer configurations. Atrophy classifications were associated with diverging clinical profiles and tau accumulation patterns. In prospective designs mirroring contemporary AD trials, they stratified longitudinal cognitive trajectories and outperformed semi-quantitative visual MRI assessments as a clinically established comparator. These findings support the integration of automated atrophy subtyping and staging into clinical practice and pharmacological trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.