ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2026
Optimizing third-line and beyond therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer in Taiwan: an evidence-based consensus.
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a major public health burden in Taiwan. Despite multiple later-line therapies, outcomes remain suboptimal. International guidelines provide valuable direction, but are difficult to apply locally due to differences in drug accessibility, reimbursement policies, and practice patterns. Objectives: This initiative developed a Taiwan-specific, consensus framework for managing mCRC in the third line and beyond. Design: This consensus integrated global evidence with local practice, real-world data, and reimbursement considerations. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of 20 experts convened by the Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (TSCRS) used a modified Delphi process. Initial recommendations were adapted from European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Pan-Asian ESMO, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, supplemented by Taiwan real-world data. Consensus was achieved through three structured rounds of voting and discussion, with final statements graded by level of evidence and strength of agreement. Results: Twelve recommendations spanning three domains were endorsed: disease management, third-line options, and extended strategies. Key local adaptations include aligning imaging schedule intervals with Taiwan's National Health Insurance reimbursement policies and prioritizing trifluridine/tipiracil and regorafenib as preferred third-line agents. The panel acknowledged emerging options such as fruquintinib, epidermal growth factor receptor antibody rechallenge, and novel chemotherapy combinations. While the panel strongly supported biomarker-informed treatments, their broader implementation is constrained by limited reimbursement coverage for next-generation sequencing. Other challenges included limited drug access, suboptimal uptake of biomarker testing, and reimbursement constraints. Conclusion: This Taiwan-specific consensus provides a practical, evidence-based framework for late-line mCRC treatment, bridging global standards with local realities to improve policy alignment and optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.