ArticleExperiments in fluids2026
Assessment of event-based vision sensor cameras for measuring bubbly flow characteristics.
Article in Experiments in fluids, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, the capability of Event-based Vision Sensor (EVS) cameras for measuring simultaneously bubble motion, size, and shape in complex bubbly flows has been assessed. This assessment initially focused on benchmark evaluation of the accuracy of an EVS camera in tracking the motion and size of precisely manufactured naturally buoyant particles in quiescent water. Experiments were carried out in synchronization with a conventional high-speed (HS) camera, enabling quantitative comparison. The synchronized measurements obtained from both cameras agreed well with differences of less than 0.65% in measured particle velocities and 2.4% in measured diameters, demonstrating the EVS camera's capability to precisely measure motion and dimensions. Following this validation, the assessment expanded to characterize bubbles generated by injecting compressed air at various pressures at the bottom of a quiescent water tank. The EVS camera demonstrated comparable performance to the HS camera in measuring bubble size and velocity at low to moderate injection pressures. The bubble tracks uniquely captured by the EVS camera, due to its adjustable accumulation time, can be leveraged to extract trajectory and velocity information, as well as instances of partial bubble visual overlap in the camera view. However, event saturation is observed at the EVS camera for several events generated by bubble motion that surpasses a critical threshold (e.g., dense bubbly flow). Subsequently, the increased latency at both pixel levels and read-out leads to temporal misalignment relative to the flow bubble dynamics. This challenge was addressed by employing a pulsed illumination source, which allowed the camera to capture dense bubbly flows, as the increased presence of bubbles corresponds to a reduced number of EVS recorded events. Overall, the assessment highlights that EVS cameras offer comparable performance to conventional HS cameras in characterising bubbly flows with two additional unique advantages. (i) Ability to record bubble tracks, which can be directly used for bubble velocimetry. (ii) An instantaneous EVS camera image records events at a significantly reduced data rate, which enables real-time bubble EVS imaging at higher speeds than conventional HS cameras. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00348-026-04272-5.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.