Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428021›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Affinage: Genome-Scale Mechanistic Gene Annotation from the Published Literature.

Matteo Di Bernardo, Iain M Cheeseman

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matteo Di BernardoWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Iain M CheesemanWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Molecular Analysis of Kinetochore FunctionR35GM126930 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI Iain McPherson Cheeseman · 2018 to 2026
$7.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanistic function of a gene is a critical starting point for biology. However, for much of the human proteome that knowledge is scattered across thousands of primary papers or remains poorly established, while the curated databases biologists rely on can lag years behind recent literature. Large language models can now read and synthesize that literature on demand, but doing so faithfully for many genes is an expensive, non-reproducible retrieval session that does not scale across users. Here, we present Affinage, an LLM pipeline that performs this retrieval and mechanistic reasoning once per gene - from the primary literature alone - and stores the result as a reusable, structured annotation. A biologist-designed reading pass extracts only direct experimental evidence, and a synthesis pass reasons over those findings alone. Applied across the genome, Affinage annotates 19,293 human protein-coding genes. This analysis provides mechanism for thousands of genes whose UniProt function is empty or a stub, beating the curated reference on 99.1% of head-to-head genes as scored by a cross-family LLM judge. Affinage also delineates the ~10% of the proteome that remains mechanistically uncharacterized and will serve as a continuously-updated, literature-grounded census of gene function. All records are released openly at https://affinage.wi.mit.edu. More broadly, Affinage serves as an example of how domain experts can encode their expertise into scalable LLM pipelines to improve the publicly available data that guides biological hypotheses and experimentation.

Identifiers

PMID42428021
PMCPMC13345584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.