Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428013›Full record

ArticleEmerging topics in life sciences2026

Are all students getting maximum value from bioscience practicals? Exploring the benefits of inclusive competence-based design.

Dominic C Henri, Katharine E Hubbard

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dominic C HenriSchool of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Hull, HU6 7RX, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7574-5846
Katharine E HubbardLearning Enhancement and Academic Practice, Buckinghamshire New University, HP11 2JZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4862-0466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practical work is expensive, complicated to organise and often exclusionary. However, practicals are commonly considered a core component of research-based bioscience education. This is difficult to justify when the majority of bioscience students will not go into bioscience research. We therefore need to have a robust rationale for including practical work in bioscience curricula, and to maximise the value of all practicals for all students whether in the laboratory, field or computational space. In this opinion article, we propose a competence-based education model for bioscience practical work, seeing competence as the ability to integrate skills, knowledge, attitudes and connections between practical learning and the wider world. We argue that using a competence model allows us to focus on the true value of practical work, and therefore to design more inclusive and authentic learning experiences. We encourage bioscience educators to rigorously question the purpose of practicals in their programmes, and whether they can maximise their educational value through more deliberate competence-driven curriculum design.

Indexed as

competenceeducationlearningpractical workteaching

Identifiers

PMID42428013
PMCPMC13043651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.