Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428007›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

A comparative study of nonlinear cleanup rules in resonator networks.

Calvin Yeung, Prathyush Poduval, Mohsen Imani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Calvin YeungDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Prathyush PoduvalDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Mohsen ImaniDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hopfield networks retrieve stored patterns through recurrent nonlinear updates, and later associative-memory variants broaden this design space through alternative nonlinear retrieval rules. Resonator networks use an analogous iterative procedure to solve vector-symbolic factorization: each factor estimate is updated by unbinding the current estimates of the other factors and applying a cleanup rule against the corresponding codebook. This perspective suggests a family of resonator networks indexed by the cleanup nonlinearity. We study four variants-sign cleanup, ReLU cleanup, polynomial cleanup, and softmax cleanup-and compare their factorization capacity, terminal failure modes, convergence behavior, empirical complexity, hyperparameter sensitivity, matched-dimensionality FHRR behavior, sign-projection choices, internal update noise, and neural-output decomposition on visual scene data. Across these evaluations, the cleanup nonlinearity changes both the capacity transition and the dominant failure mode. These results motivate treating resonator networks as a family of modern Hopfield-inspired factorization dynamics rather than as a single update rule.

Indexed as

associative memorybound-vector factorizationcompositional representationshopfield networkshyperdimensional computingnonlinear cleanup rulesresonator networksvector symbolic architectures

Identifiers

PMID42428007
PMCPMC13346072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.