Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428005›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

GeoGuard-PTI: a geo-temporal predictive threat intelligence framework with spatiotemporal attack forecasting and closed-loop adaptive defense.

Aravindhan Manivannan, Anthoniraj Amalanathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aravindhan ManivannanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anthoniraj AmalanathanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to being reactive in nature, most network security frameworks focus on identifying attacks as they take place or reconstructing intrusion sequences once they have already occurred. This paper presents GeoGuard-PTI, an innovative Geo-Temporal Predictive Threat Intelligence framework designed to shift that paradigm by predicting pending cyber attacks before they arrive at monitored infrastructure. GeoGuard-PTI utilizes geo-tagged telemetry from a Real-Time Intrusion Detection Module, an Active Geo-Fencing Prevention Module, and a Forensic Analysis Module, processing it through a Spatiotemporal Graph Attention Network (ST-GAT) combined with a Temporal Diffusion Predictor (TDP). Attack propagation is modeled as epidemiological diffusion over a Dynamic Geographic Graph to produce probabilistic Threat Propagation Maps (TPMs) across five prediction horizons (15 min to 24 h). A Closed-Loop Adaptive Defense Cycle (CLADC) operationalizes these TPMs into IPS pre-arming signals while driving continuous online learning without offline retraining. Evaluated across five publicly available datasets-NSL-KDD, UNSW-NB15, CICIDS2017, TON-IoT, and BOT-IoT-augmented with synthetic geo-propagation traces, GeoGuard-PTI attains a mean 15-min prediction accuracy of 96.4%, a 2-h accuracy of 91.2%, and a false alarm rate below 1.9%. Operational trials show a ~34.1% reduction in successful intrusions and a ~67.9% drop in mean time-to-block compared with purely reactive baselines, with IPS pre-arming latency held under 3 ms throughout.

Indexed as

attack propagationclosed-loop adaptive defensecyber epidemiologydeep learningexplainable AIfederated learningGeoGuardgeo-temporal forecasting

Identifiers

PMID42428005
PMCPMC13346090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.