ArticleNational science review2026
Polar dimming and mid-latitude brightening in a warming climate.
Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Downward surface solar radiation (DSSR) is the dominant energy source for the Earth's surface. It exhibits pronounced spatial heterogeneity and a strong seasonal cycle, yet how these features would evolve under global warming remains poorly understood. Here, we show a pronounced future meridional contrast in DSSR changes, with polar dimming and Northern Hemisphere (NH) mid-latitude brightening. This contrast peaks in local summer, weakening the seasonal cycle of DSSR at high latitudes with a multi-model mean of 14.6% (12.7%-17.6% for the interquartile range; same hereafter) in the Arctic, 7.0% (5.8%-8.1%) in the Antarctic, while slightly strengthening it over NH mid-latitudes by 2.1% (0.7%-3.1%) in the high-emission scenario SSP585. Under global warming, reduced clouds contribute to the mid-latitude brightening, whereas increased cloud liquid water contributes to polar dimming. Instead, increased water vapor under global warming drives the widespread clear-sky DSSR dimming. As a result, cloud-induced and clear-sky effects have comparable contributions to the polar dimming, while the cloud-induced brightening overwhelms the water-vapor-induced dimming in the NH mid-latitudes. The changes in the DSSR would alter the surface energy balance, which may exert significant influences on the polar amplification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.