ArticleNational science review2026
Direct ink writing of tantalum: tailorable hierarchical porous scaffold for osteogenesis.
Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To mitigate the risk of osseointegration failure in bone defect reconstruction, innovative fabrication strategies for developing implants with optimal biocompatibility and enhanced osteogenic capacity are crucial. Hierarchical porous structures formed by the synergistic combination of macropores (∼300-600 μm) and micropores (smaller than 20 μm) can better mimic the structural characteristics of native bone, thereby promoting osteogenesis. In this study, we developed direct ink writing (DIW) technology to fabricate a graded porous tantalum scaffold designed to promote osteogenesis. In the DIW printing process, a rheologically optimized ink and carefully calibrated printing parameters were utilized, enabling stable fabrication of patient-specific scaffold precursors with well-defined macropores. Following a controlled sintering process, the scaffolds exhibited macropores (∼400-500 μm in diameter) and interconnected micropores (∼0.5-23 μm in diameter), allowing tailoring of the mechanical properties and porosity to closely approximate those of native human bone. The well-controlled hierarchical porous structure exhibited excellent biocompatibility and significantly increased osteoinductive performance both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.