Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42427978›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Case report: Injury plausibility for skull fractures in two kittens.

Jennifer A Woolf

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jennifer A WoolfWoolf Veterinary Forensics Consulting, Inc., Dublin, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A forensic postmortem examination (FPME) was performed on two kittens. In each case, investigators were given conflicting stories describing how the kitten died. The goal for each FPME was to determine the cause of death with the hope of also determining which story was more plausible. In both cases, animal control officers responded to a call to retrieve a deceased kitten. In the first case, the kitten's owner reported the kitten had died when thrown to the floor by the owner's boyfriend; the boyfriend reported he had accidentally dropped the kitten. In the second case, an ex-girlfriend of the owner reported the owner had crushed the kitten's head against a wall; the owner stated the kitten had come between a wall and a piece of furniture being moved, causing its accidental death. Findings from the radiographs, FPME, and histopathology showed the cause of death in the first case to be blunt force trauma resulting in a non-pathological skull fracture and traumatic brain injury (TBI). The distribution and type of injuries were consistent with being thrown against the floor and were not consistent with an accidental fall. Findings from the radiographs and FPME of the second case also showed blunt force trauma to the head leading to TBI and death, but could not determine which story was more plausible due to a limited investigation resulting in a lack of information necessary to make the distinction. Together, the two cases demonstrate the importance of a FPME in cases of suspicious death while also demonstrating the limitations of FPME alone in determining whether a death is accidental or malicious. They also demonstrate the limitations of current literature on animal abuse and the need for more studies and case reports specific to animal maltreatment.

Indexed as

animal crueltyblunt head injuriesskull fracturesveterinary forensic postmortem examinationveterinary forensics

Identifiers

PMID42427978
PMCPMC13347116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.