ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Research progress on testicular torsion secondary to inguinal cryptorchidism.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Inguinal cryptorchidism, a common congenital anomaly in pediatric patients, is a major risk factor for testicular torsion. Its abnormal anatomical location and atypical clinical manifestations frequently lead to delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. This study aims to systematically review existing evidence to clarify the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic key points, and prognosis of testicular torsion secondary to inguinal cryptorchidism, with the goal of providing robust, evidence-based references for clinical practice. Method: This narrative review synthesizes and summarizes recent clinical studies, case reports, and related discussions on testicular torsion secondary to inguinal cryptorchidism, comprehensively analyzing current research findings on this condition. Result: Children with inguinal cryptorchidism have approximately a 10-fold higher risk of testicular torsion compared with those with normally descended testes in the scrotum. Typical clinical manifestations include an acute painful inguinal mass and an empty ipsilateral scrotum, which can easily be confused with incarcerated indirect inguinal hernia and other acute groin disorders. Missed diagnosis is a leading cause of increased testicular necrosis and orchiectomy rates. Color Doppler ultrasound is the preferred first-line imaging modality. The core therapeutic principle adheres to "Time is testis," and urgent surgical exploration is indicated in cases with high clinical suspicion. Intraoperatively, testicular repositioning and fixation or orchiectomy are performed according to the evaluation of testicular viability. Prophylactic contralateral orchiopexy is strongly recommended. Long-term management mainly focuses on monitoring for testicular atrophy, reproductive function, and the risk of malignant transformation. Conclusion: The core principles for diagnosing and treating testicular torsion secondary to inguinal cryptorchidism are early recognition, imaging confirmation, emergent surgery, and long-term follow-up. Clinicians should maintain high vigilance for acute inguinal masses in infants and young children and regard an ipsilateral empty scrotum as a key differential diagnostic clue. Surgical delay caused by atypical symptoms must be avoided. Enhanced routine screening, optimized emergency assessment protocols, and standardized long-term follow-up can effectively improve the prognosis of affected children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.