ArticleAdvances in virology2026
Prediction of Treatment Response in Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Coinfected Patients Using a Leakage-Proof, Internally Validated Logistic Regression Pipeline.
Article in Advances in virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coinfection of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus presents great difficulty in treatment procedures, especially in terms of prediction of the response to the direct-acting antiviral therapy. In view of this, developing adequate prediction models would play a vital role in ensuring better personalization and effectiveness in terms of treatment. The objective of this paper is to develop and validate prediction models for the identification of patients' responses to direct-acting antiviral therapy in chronic HBV/HCV coinfected patients following treatment completion. This retrospective clinical prediction study involved the use of medical records of 154 patients with HBV/HCV coinfection treated with the help of direct-acting antiviral therapy in Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Sixteen predictors were used to develop logistic regression models to predict treatment responses at 4 and 12 weeks. In addition, to counter the problems of class imbalance, the synthetic minority oversampling technique was applied to the datasets, while nested stratified cross-validation was used for hyperparameter tuning and model validation. Performance was evaluated through different performance metrics such as ROC-AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The performance of the two models was very good at each endpoint. For the endpoint of 4 weeks, the ROC-AUC score was 0.858 (95% CI 0.746-0.942), the accuracy was 0.760, and the F1-score was 0.851. In the case of the 12-week endpoint, the ROC-AUC score was 0.850 (95% CI 0.769-0.916), the accuracy was 0.786, and the F1-score was 0.856. The important predictors were HCV genotypes, age, body mass index, hemoglobin, and liver function test results. Good model calibration was evident from the calibration graphs, which showed slight deviation from the ideal calibration line at both endpoints. The current study developed prediction models for treatment response in HBV/HCV coinfected patients based on clinical and laboratory information from baseline. The models showed very good internal validity, but the 12-week model performed slightly better than the 4-week model in terms of classification balance. Such models represent useful tools for decision-making in case of a personalized approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.