ArticleAnaesthesia reports
Study protocol for the SECURE (RAFT-5) study: Service Evaluation of in-hospital Cross-speciality UK adult Rapid sequence intubation Events.
Article in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid sequence intubation has evolved substantially since its inception over 50 years ago. Contemporary in-hospital rapid sequence intubation practice includes a combination of variably employed components, many of which lack robust supporting evidence. Real-world practice and the beliefs underpinning it are poorly characterised. We present the protocol for SECURE (Service Evaluation of Cross-speciality United Kingdom Rapid Sequence Intubation Events), a prospective service evaluation which aims to characterise adult in-hospital rapid sequence intubation practice across the United Kingdom. SECURE will comprise three electronic surveys (with data collection windows): (1) a Site Survey (six weeks) assessing local resources and governance; (2) a Vignette-based Survey (seven weeks) exploring drivers of variation in self-reported rapid sequence intubation practice; and (3) an Activity Survey (14 days per site) capturing user-defined rapid sequence intubation events and immediate complications. Survey development followed the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies and was reviewed by expert advisers. Data will be stored securely at the Sponsor site and analysed in collaboration with a statistician. SECURE will provide a national overview of in-hospital rapid sequence intubation practice, including variation in resources and decision-making and describe the incidence of immediate complications. Formally recognised as a service evaluation, the study will be registered with information governance departments and represents the fifth project of the Research and Audit Federation of Anaesthetists in Training, overseen by the SECURE Investigation Group. Findings will inform future recommendations, investment and research in rapid sequence intubation practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.