Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42427880›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Understanding Primary Care Physicians' Comprehension of Eye Care Notes to Improve Diabetes Care Coordination.

Lauren E Wedekind, Fritz Gerald P Kalaw, Helena Gali, Kristen Kulasa, Kendall Moore, Quinn Quackenbush, Sally L Baxter, Christine Thorne

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren E WedekindUniversity of California San Diego.
Fritz Gerald P KalawUniversity of California San Diego.
Helena GaliVantage Eye Center.
Kristen KulasaUniversity of California San Diego.
Kendall MooreUniversity of California San Diego.
Quinn QuackenbushUniversity of California San Diego.
Sally L BaxterUniversity of California San Diego.
Christine ThorneUniversity of California San Diego.

Funding

Bridge2AI:Salutogenesis Data Generation ProjectOT2OD032644 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU, CHUTE, CHRISTOPHER G · 2022 to 2025
$32.7M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007198 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHI, NEIL C, INSEL, PAUL A · 1985 to 2024
$29.3M
Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LINDA M ZANGWILL · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
Multi-modal Health Information Technology Innovations for Precision Management of GlaucomaDP5OD029610 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007198NIH HHS DP5 OD029610NIH HHS OT2 OD032644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy screening and management involve collaboration between primary care providers (PCPs), endocrinologists, and eye care providers, yet eye care documentation poses challenges to inter-specialty communication. Objective: To assess PCP and endocrinologist comprehension of ophthalmology notes, identify barriers to interpretation, and identify strategies for improvement. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 82 PCPs and endocrinologists across three academic tertiary health systems between November 2022 and December 2024. The survey collected demographic data, prior rotations in ophthalmology, and self-reported comprehension of components of eye care notes using 5-point Likert scales. 67 participants reviewed three sample eye care progress notes and identified whether a dilated fundus examination was performed and the presence of diabetic retinopathy for each note. Free-text responses were analyzed thematically. Results: Self-reported comprehension of eye care documentation was modest: 47% agreed and 6% strongly agreed that they generally understand eye care notes. Comprehension of sample notes similarly varied, with correct identification of dilation status ranging from 94-96% and diabetic retinopathy status from 37-82%. 29% of respondents who answered fewer than half of the questions correctly reported confidence in their general understanding of eye care notes. Major barriers to inter-specialty care coordination for patients with diabetes included inconsistent coding and formatting and use of ophthalmology-specific jargon and abbreviations. Conclusions: PCPs and endocrinologists demonstrated variable confidence in their comprehension of eye care documentation, with measurable gaps in interpreting key clinical elements of notes. More standardized and structured documentation may improve inter-specialty communication and coordination of care for patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

diabetesdiabetic retinopathyEHRnotesophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID42427880
PMCPMC13345568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.