ArticleResearch square2026
An Electronic Phenotype Series for Measuring Adherence to the Wake Up and Breathe Protocol in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The Wake Up and Breathe protocol integrates daily spontaneous awakening and breathing trials to facilitate earlier weaning from mechanical ventilation, improving outcomes for patients with acute respiratory failure. Measuring adherence to this multistep, interprofessional practice is essential but is challenged by informatics complexity and the risk of metric-specific gaming. Our objective was to define and validate an electronic phenotype series enabling retrospective, scalable, and reliable measurement of protocol adherence using real-world electronic health record data from a multi-hospital warehouse, with the patient-day as the unit of analysis and agreement against manual chart review of 200 stratified patient-days assessed using Cohen's Kappa. Results: Seven phenotypes were defined: two for upstream eligibility, four for protocol process steps, and one for a downstream outcome. Agreement with chart review ranged from moderate to near-perfect, with lower agreement linked to documentation granularity and rapid clinical events. This phenotype series offers a reusable framework for measuring adoption of the Wake Up and Breathe protocol and supports scalable quality measurement and retrospective analysis across ICU settings, though some protocol components remain unmeasured given current data availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.