ReviewCurrent pediatrics reports2026
The Impact of Politicization on Adolescent Medicine Care: A Rapid Review.
Review in Current pediatrics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Increased politicization of health care, exemplified by bans on gender-affirming and reproductive care, has significantly impacted adolescents' ability to receive safe care. We conducted a rapid review of evidence examining politicized health legislation's impact on adolescents' right to health, focusing on reproductive, gender-affirming, and eating disorder care. Recent Findings: Politicization of care has impacted adolescents' right to health by creating financial barriers and changes in geographic access. For example, state legislative ban on abortion and gender-affirming care have created care deserts in which adolescents are forced to travel to receive care. These changes have resulted in delays in care, loss of bodily autonomy, and negative impacts on physical and mental health. Summary: The findings of this rapid review have important implications for adolescent medicine clinical practices. Providers caring for adolescents require institutional support and resources to address increased patient psychosocial concerns and potentially higher patient volume as a result of restrictive legislation. Ultimately, policy advocacy is necessary to change legislation disrupting adolescents' right to health. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40124-026-00379-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.