ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Evaluating Approaches for Inference Testing of Whole-Brain Densely Sampled Single-Subject Task fMRI Data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Task-based precision mapping has become a promising technique in functional MRI (fMRI) to robustly characterize and map an individual's unique activity patterns. These experiments consist of acquiring extensive imaging data in one participant, ultimately improving the sensitivity and specificity of individual-specific functional localization. Despite its advantages, studies have primarily focused on understanding individual-specific cortical activation, preventing a holistic view of a systems-level functional response, and to date, best approaches for the statistical analysis of controlled task-based, densely sampled, whole-brain data have not yet been fully established. Therefore, in this study, we collected whole-brain (i.e. covering cortex, cerebellum, and brainstem) multi-echo densely sampled data of the auditory system, a system with major subcortical components, and evaluated activation sensitivity as well as activation stability across data subsets of commonly-used whole-brain and region-specific inference testing approaches. The whole-brain approaches involved standard voxel-level and cluster-level inference schemes with varying statistical thresholds and a non-parametric permutation inference approach. The region-specific approaches involved an exploratory top % t-statistics methods and non-parametric permutation inference approaches. We found that a whole-brain voxel-level approach with a false discovery rate (FDR) correction (p<0.05) presented highest sensitivity across regions and subjects as well as most consistent detection of expected auditory regions, even with lower scan duration. In addition, we found that a region-specific top % t-statistic approach may be a useful exploratory functional localization tool and a complementary method to standard inference testing approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.