ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A 3D Brain Geometry Toolkit for Multisite Neuroimaging Analysis.
Yanghee Im, Melody J Y Kang, Boris A Gutman, Pravesh Parekh, Diliana Pecheva, Anders M Dale, Ole A Andreassen, Paul M Thompson, Christopher R K Ching
Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraphArticle in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
9 authors.
Melody J Y KangImaging Genetics Center, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA.
Boris A GutmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Pravesh ParekhCenter for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Diliana PechevaCenter for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Anders M DaleCenter for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ole A AndreassenCentre for Precision Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Paul M ThompsonImaging Genetics Center, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA.
Christopher R K ChingImaging Genetics Center, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA.
Funding
OTA-21-015A Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Initiative: NYU Langone Health Clinical Science Core, Data Resource Core, and PASC Biorepository CoreOT2HL161847 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GROSS, RACHEL SHARON, HORWITZ, LEORA · 2021 to 2025
$651.0MABCD-USA Consortium: Data Analysis, Informatics and Resource CenterU24DA041123 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ANDERS M DALE · 2015 to 2026
$51.5MHealthy Brain and Child Development National Consortium Data Coordinating CenterU24DA055330 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERS M DALE, Damien A Fair · 2021 to 2026
$34.6MThe VETSA Longitudinal MRI Twin Study of Aging (VETSA MRI 4)R01AG076838 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ANDERS M DALE, Jeremy A Elman · 2022 to 2026
$8.7MENIGMA Bipolar Initiative: A Global Study of Imaging Genomics & Clinical OutcomesR01MH129742 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christopher Ching, PAUL M THOMPSON · 2022 to 2026
$3.0MSearching for Endophenotypes of Bipolar DisorderR01MH085667 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SOARES, JAIR C · 2012 to 2016
$3.0MFederated Deep Learning to Accelerate Alzheimer's Disease ResearchRF1AG081571 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AMBITE, JOSE LUIS, THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2025 to 2025
$2.5MStructural and Functional Brain Aging in Bipolar DisorderR01MH083968 · NIMH · VETERANS MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN/SAN DIEGO · PI EYLER, LISA T · 2010 to 2014
$1.7MNeuroimaging mechanisms of overlap between alcoholism and bipolar disorderK23AA020842 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PRISCIANDARO, JAMES JOSEPH · 2012 to 2016
$835kENIGMA World Aging CenterR56AG058854 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2018 to 2018
$683kFederated Deep Learning to Accelerate Alzheimer's Disease ResearchR01AG081571 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AMBITE, JOSE LUIS, THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2024 to 2024
$661kLarge-scale fine mapping of brain morphometry in bipolar disorder and major depressionR21MH139001 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christopher Ching, Matthew Kempton · 2025 to 2026
$331kNHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL161847NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA020842NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076838NIA NIH HHS R01 AG081571NIA NIH HHS R56 AG058854NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG081571NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041123NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA055330NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083968NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085667NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129742NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH139001
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Compared to traditional gross volumetrics, surface-based models provide greater spatial precision for understanding brain alterations related to developmental, neurological, and psychiatric disorders. Large-scale brain initiatives are combining data from around the world to discover and improve illness-related brain markers. Here, we present a toolkit for 3D brain geometry analysis aimed at addressing key challenges facing large-scale neuroimaging studies. Our framework incorporates scalable methods for multisite data integration, site-specific confound correction, accelerated statistical modeling, interpretable machine learning, and interactive results visualization. The toolkit was tested on data from 21 independently collected study samples participating in the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group (N = 3,373). Compared to traditional volume features, we show how subcortical shape measures can be combined across study sites to capture spatially complex differences between diagnostic groups and associations with common treatments. Statistical modeling was accelerated using the Fast and Efficient Mixed-Effects Algorithm (FEMA) and achieved a 16-fold reduction in computation time compared to traditional approaches. Machine learning models showed shape features may provide greater predictive performance over traditional volumes for both diagnostic and treatment prediction tasks, with interpretable weight maps providing insights into the local features driving model performance.
Indexed as
Big DataBrain GeometryMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMulti-site Study
Identifiers
PMID42427731
PMCPMC13345293
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390