ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Within-electrode temporal envelope processing predicts multi-channel speech outcomes across cochlear implant pulse rates.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing by stimulating auditory neurons to encode amplitude envelopes across frequency bands, providing essential cues for speech recognition. This study investigated how stimulation pulse rate constrains temporal envelope processing and speech cue perception in ten post-lingually deaf CI users by evaluating amplitude modulation (AM) detection thresholds and consonant identification performance across pulse rates. The effects of pulse rate on temporal processing and speech perception were examined using both standard clinical multi-channel strategies and single-channel strategies designed to isolate within-channel envelope representations. Results revealed a significant decline in AM detection and consonant recognition performance at the lowest tested pulse rate of 125 pulses per second (pps), consistent with perceptual constraints on temporal processing at low carrier rates, rather than inadequate envelope sampling. At the highest pulse rate of 4000pps, a non-significant reduction in AM detection was observed which may be consistent with previously reported reductions in amplitude discrimination at high pulse rates. Consonant recognition performance remained stable across clinically relevant pulse rates (250-2000pps), though listener-specific pulse rate effects were observed. Notably, significant correlations were found between single-channel and multi-channel performance in AM detection and consonant recognition tasks. These findings support an important contribution of within-electrode temporal envelope processing to multichannel speech perception and highlight the clinical relevance of individual variability in pulse rate effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.