ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Monitoring microscope performance in an imaging facility using OMERO-metrics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microscopes are essential tools for discoveries on a scale invisible to the unaided human eye. The development of immuno-fluorescence followed by molecular biology techniques and fluorescent fusion proteins have revolutionised the use of optical microscopy in bioscience. The quality of the data produced is dependent upon the sample, its preparation and the instrument used. However, instruments can degrade over time without easily visible changes to the produced images and, in turn, negatively impacts results. By testing instruments and doing comparisons between results over time and between different instruments, problems can be highlighted and corrective action can be taken. Using small fluorescent beads the point spread function (PSF) of the microscope can be recorded and the image resolution measured. Beads were prepared in a concentration matched to the field of view size and dried onto coverslips and mounted on slides. The beads were then imaged as 3D Z-stacks of sufficient size to fully enclose the PSF of the system. This data was uploaded to OMERO and processed using OMERO-metrics, an OMERO plugin developed for this purpose. This paper summarizes the development of workflows and protocols to enable this process, presents the results obtained and demonstrates the detection of significant instrument issues.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.