Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42427628›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Monitoring microscope performance in an imaging facility using OMERO-metrics.

Sophia Sommer, Oumou Dhmine, Julio Mateos Langerak, Ian M Dobbie

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophia SommerBaltimore Polytechnic Institute, 1400 West Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21209, USA.
Oumou DhmineMontpellier Ressources Imagerie, BioCampus, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France. https://ror.org/04x7ec535.
Julio Mateos LangerakMontpellier Ressources Imagerie, BioCampus, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France. https://ror.org/04x7ec535.
Ian M DobbieJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biology, Mudd Hall, 3400N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. https://ror.org/00za53h95.ORCID 0000-0002-5531-5865

Funding

Acquisition of a Carl Zeiss Lightsheet Z.1 Fluorescence MicroscopeS10OD020152 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCCAFFERY, J. MICHAEL · 2016 to 2016
$597k
Acquisition of a Carl Zeiss Cell Observer Spinning Disk Confocal MicroscopeS10OD010712 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCCAFFERY, J. MICHAEL · 2013 to 2013
$536k
Zeiss LSM 510 META Confocal MicroscopeS10RR019409 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCCAFFERY, J. MICHAEL · 2004 to 2004
$485k
Acquisition of GE Typhoon FLA9500 Variable Mode ImagerS10OD021567 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCCAFFERY, J. MICHAEL · 2017 to 2017
$147k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR019409NIH HHS S10 OD010712NIH HHS S10 OD020152NIH HHS S10 OD021567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopes are essential tools for discoveries on a scale invisible to the unaided human eye. The development of immuno-fluorescence followed by molecular biology techniques and fluorescent fusion proteins have revolutionised the use of optical microscopy in bioscience. The quality of the data produced is dependent upon the sample, its preparation and the instrument used. However, instruments can degrade over time without easily visible changes to the produced images and, in turn, negatively impacts results. By testing instruments and doing comparisons between results over time and between different instruments, problems can be highlighted and corrective action can be taken. Using small fluorescent beads the point spread function (PSF) of the microscope can be recorded and the image resolution measured. Beads were prepared in a concentration matched to the field of view size and dried onto coverslips and mounted on slides. The beads were then imaged as 3D Z-stacks of sufficient size to fully enclose the PSF of the system. This data was uploaded to OMERO and processed using OMERO-metrics, an OMERO plugin developed for this purpose. This paper summarizes the development of workflows and protocols to enable this process, presents the results obtained and demonstrates the detection of significant instrument issues.

Identifiers

PMID42427628
PMCPMC13345307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.