ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Noise statistics drive background- and channel-specific interference in auditory midbrain representations of speech.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although humans and animals excel at interpreting target sounds in competing noise, sound recognition abilities can vary widely due to statistical characteristics of the interfering background. Yet, how the brain leverages statistical sound information to segregate sounds in noise remains unclear. Here, using many natural auditory textures as background stimuli, we test how the encoding of speech is altered by natural noises in the inferior colliculus (IC) of unanesthetized rabbits. We identify foreground- and background-driven neural response components to sound mixtures and find that the background statistics alter the neural representation of speech in a frequency- and modulation-specific manner. Neural encoding signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) vary extensively across background categories, frequencies, and modulations, and these influence the encoding of speech independently of the acoustic SNR. This variability is driven by both the background spectrum and modulation statistics, which distort the speech representation and show distinct interference effects in the modulation ranges for rhythm and pitch. Thus, spectrum and modulation statistics critical to speech recognition in noise are reflected in IC neural population activity. These neural response statistics and resulting distortions likely determine the coding fidelity for speech in downstream cortical regions and provide a neural basis for differences in speech intelligibility in real-world noises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.