ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Distillation enables scalable high-fidelity virtual screening across ultra-large chemical libraries.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate virtual screening of ultra-large chemical libraries remains challenging. Existing approaches rely on lower-fidelity scoring functions or sampling-based strategies that can limit predictive accuracy and bias the exploration of chemical space. Here, we present FastBindRank, a distillation-based framework that transfers the predictive power of the structure-based model Boltz-2 into an efficient sequence-based surrogate. Trained on ~1% of the 122-million-compound PubChem library, FastBindRank enables high-fidelity screening at scale. Applied to histone deacetylase 11 (HDAC11), FastBindRank substantially enriched high-confidence binders relative to the background chemical space. The lightweight model captured structural patterns associated with predicted binding, revealing structural determinants of binding. Under a comparable computational budget, FastBindRank achieved a 74-fold increase in hit rate and over a 30-fold increase in discovery yield over direct subset-based screening. Experimental validation confirmed the activity of two novel compounds. These results establish distillation as a practical strategy for scalable, high-fidelity virtual screening of ultra-large chemical libraries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.