ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Toward Optimizing Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Cortical Modulation: A Surrogate Brain Approach.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The thalamus is a central hub that interfaces with widespread cortical and subcortical nodes. Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) offers a principled strategy for distributed cortical modulation: since distinct thalamic nuclei project to spatially segregated cortical territories, stimulation at a single thalamic site can influence multiple cortical nodes. Realizing this potential requires accurate subject-specific estimates of directed thalamocortical effective connectivity (EC) and a computational framework for optimizing stimulation parameters that achieve desired cortical responses. Here, we address both challenges using Neural Perturbational Inference (NPI), a surrogate-brain approach that estimates EC by applying virtual perturbations to a nonlinear dynamical model fitted to resting-state fMRI data. We extend NPI to a high-resolution thalamocortical network comprising 360 cortical regions and 442 thalamic voxels spanning 12 nuclei. We introduce two innovations in training: (i) a temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR)-weighted loss accounting for signal heterogeneity, and (ii) a multi-resolution, cross-scale consistency loss that regularizes model complexity. These strategies yield improved performance in synthetic benchmarks across varying tSNR regimes. Leveraging the inferred subject-specific EC, we further formulate a constrained linear control problem to identify sparse thalamic stimulation targets that achieve desired cortical activation patterns. We validate the inferred EC structure on two independent datasets: the MacStim dataset comprising two macaque monkeys with infrared neural stimulation on medial pulvinar, and the HumanTC resting-state fMRI dataset comprising twelve human subjects. Our results reveal site-specific thalamocortical EC profiles, producing interpretable predictions that align with known ground-truth structures. Together, this work establishes a computationally grounded pathway toward personalized optimization of thalamic DBS in both human and nonhuman primates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.