Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42427494›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2026

Reliable and Interpretable Visual Field Progression Prediction with Diffusion Models and Conformal Risk Control.

Wenwen Si, Vivian Lin, Bo Sun, Kuk Jin Jang, Rubo Xing, Almiqdad Saeed, Rina Nagatani, Oleg Sokolsky, Insup Lee, Lama Al-Aswad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wenwen SiDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Vivian LinElectrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bo SunDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kuk Jin JangDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rubo XingDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Almiqdad SaeedDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rina NagataniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Oleg SokolskyDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Insup LeeDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lama Al-AswadDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

SCH: Robust and Equitable Clinical Decision Support in Glaucoma Detection and Progression PredictionR01EY037101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Lama A Al-Aswad, Osbert Bastani · 2024 to 2026
$851k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY037101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting visual field progression is critical for early intervention and personalized treatment of glaucoma. However, existing methods struggle with both predictive accuracy and reliable uncertainty quantification. This paper introduces a framework that leverages diffusion models and conformal risk control to generate robust and interpretable forecasts of visual field deterioration. We first train a diffusion model to predict future visual fields based on a patient's past examinations. To ensure trustworthy predictions, we design a novel archetypal-based conformal risk control method, which provides finite-sample coverage guarantees on intervals of archetypal contributions. This framework captures the underlying structures within uncertainty, enabling clinicians to interpret a range of potential progression patterns rather than a single deterministic outcome. Experimental results illustrate that our method achieves the target archetypal contribution coverage while providing tighter prediction intervals than baselines. Visualizations show how archetypal visual field patterns contribute to prediction uncertainty, offering interpretable insights into disease progression. By combining diffusion models with conformal methods, our framework enhances the reliability of AI-assisted visual field forecasting, ultimately supporting improved clinical decision-making. Our code is available at: https://github.com/averysi224/abci.git.

Indexed as

Conformal Risk ControlDiffusion modelsVisual field

Identifiers

PMID42427494
PMCPMC13348073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.