ArticleInnovation in aging2026
Mysterious cohabitation with socially assistive robots among three underserved groups.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study investigates how underserved individuals-older adults, low-income middle-aged men, and adults with disabilities-develop long-term relationships with an AI-powered socially assistive robot (SAR) named Hyodol. We examined how these relationships evolve over eight months and why emotional outcomes differ across three groups. Research Design and Methods: Using Colaizzi's phenomenological method, the research team analyzed 13,403 conversational segments from 12 highly engaged SAR users (four from each group). Iterative coding procedures with high inter-rater reliability yielded 10 thematic categories capturing functional, social, and emotional dimensions of SAR interactions. Results: Across all groups, interactions with the SAR demonstrated a consistent relational evolution from functional devices to companions to develop emotionally reciprocal patterns of communication. Each group displayed a distinct interaction profile: older adults emphasized routine companionship, middle-aged men combined emotional expression with entertainment and exploratory questioning, and persons with disabilities used the SAR to scaffold both emotional support and social participation. Discussion and Implications: The results reveal that human-robot relationships develop meaningfully, but not uniformly across three underserved groups. The paradox observed among middle-aged men challenges assumptions that higher engagement and relational deepening may heighten emotional vulnerability. These findings highlight the need for population-specific relational models and adaptive SAR design that considers diverse emotional needs and social contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.