Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42427445›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2026

Multiply Perturbed Response: A Computational Protocol to Identify Cooperative Allosteric Residue Combinations Driving Protein Conformational Transitions.

Kübranur Kazan, Melike Berksoz, Burak Kocuk, Ali Rana Atilgan, Canan Atilgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kübranur KazanFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Melike BerksozFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Burak KocukFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Rana AtilganFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Canan AtilganFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein function often depends on dynamic conformational transitions driven by external factors or molecular interactions. Understanding the allosteric mechanisms underlying these transitions is essential for mechanistic insight into protein function. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are widely used to study protein dynamics; however, capturing large-scale, rare transitions is computationally expensive. To address this, we previously developed Perturbation Response Scanning (PRS), based on elastic network models and linear response theory, but PRS is limited in capturing collective effects because it perturbs one residue at a time. Here, we present Multiply Perturbed Response (MPR), which extends PRS by applying simultaneous perturbations to multiple residues to identify allosteric residue combinations that drive conformational transitions. This protocol provides a workflow for structure preparation, displacement, and covariance-matrix calculations, overlap analysis, and visualization. It can be applied to static structures or trajectories from MD simulations, requiring initial and final protein structures as the main inputs and an optional MD trajectory for trajectory-based analysis. The main outputs are residue combinations that maximize overlap,

Indexed as

Allosteric residue combinationsConformational transitionElastic network modelLinear response theoryMultiply perturbed responseOverlap maximizationVariance-covariance matrix

Identifiers

PMID42427445
PMCPMC13347213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.