ArticleRSC advances2026
Sustainable valorization of recycled cellulose fibers into boric acid/silica modified cementitious composites
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recycled cellulose fibers recovered from paper industry waste were valorized as sustainable reinforcement materials for the development of boric acid/silica-modified cementitious composites with balanced mechanical and thermal performance. A Taguchi-TOPSIS multi-response optimization approach was employed to systematically evaluate the combined effects of cellulose fiber, boric acid, and silica contents on compressive strength, heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and water absorption. Structural characterization by FT-IR, XRD, and SEM-EDX confirmed that the principal cement hydration phases were preserved after modification, while silica-rich formulations exhibited a relatively denser and more homogeneous matrix morphology. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that cellulose incorporation increased the total mass loss from approximately 12-14% for the reference cement to 17-20% for the modified composites, whereas boric acid and silica partially moderated this effect by maintaining residual mass values of 80-85% at elevated temperatures. Among the experimentally evaluated formulations, the Taguchi-TOPSIS multi-response optimization identified the A2B2C3 composition as the optimum formulation, achieving a compressive strength of 38.73 MPa, corresponding to a 52.63% improvement over the reference mixture, together with a 37.06% increase in heat capacity, while simultaneously reducing thermal conductivity and water absorption. These results demonstrate that the combined incorporation of recycled cellulose fibers, boric acid, and silica provides an effective strategy for developing sustainable cementitious composites with improved multifunctional performance while promoting the high-value utilization of paper industry waste.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.