ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Predictors of resilience in deaf and hard of hearing adolescents and adolescents with developmental language disorders.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many adolescents with communication problems (CP), in this case, deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) adolescents and those with developmental language disorders (DLD), tend to experience high levels of stress in their daily lives. Resilience is seen as a protective mechanism that supports adaptive functioning and helps navigate situations involving increased stress; however, little appears to be known about this group's resilience and the factors that contribute to it. Objective: This study assesses resilience and the predictive value of four factors contributing to resilience, dysfunctional schemas, theory of mind (ToM), executive functions (EFs), and social support, in adolescents with CP (DHH, DLD). Methods: Two-sided Results: Adolescents with CP reported significantly lower resilience than the reference group ( Conclusion: Adolescents with CP appear to be a quite vulnerable group of youth with low resilience to protect them from the negative effects of stress. Their dysfunctional schemas seem to serve as a predictive factor of their resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.