ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Psychological mechanisms of work responsibility among Chinese university administrative staff: the roles of organizational identification, burnout, and role conflict.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the psychological mechanisms underlying job responsibility among administrative staff in Chinese universities by integrating organizational identification, job burnout, and role conflict into a unified framework. Based on survey data from 438 administrative staff members at universities in southwestern China, structural equation modeling was used to test the proposed relationships. The results showed that organizational identification positively predicted job responsibility, whereas job burnout was negatively associated with job responsibility and partially mediated the relationship between organizational identification and job responsibility. Role conflict further moderated the relationship between job burnout and job responsibility, with burnout exerting a stronger negative effect under conditions of high role conflict. This study further extends the conceptualization of job responsibility by treating it as a responsibility-related behavioral orientation rather than merely a stable attitudinal trait. It also proposes a motivation-resource-context mechanism in which organizational identification provides motivational grounding, job burnout reflects psychological resource depletion, and role conflict represents contextual pressure. These findings extend research on responsibility-related behavior and offer practical implications for improving governance and service quality in higher education institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.