ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
A multidimensional exploration of the immediate physiological and psychological restorativeness of nature education for children in Giant Panda National Park.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the issue of "Nature-Deficit Disorder" among urban children becomes increasingly prominent, it is crucial to explore definite, scientific and systematic models of nature education. This aims to strengthen children's connection with nature, promote their physical and mental health, enhance their self-awareness and social cognition, and improve their interpersonal relationships and decision-making skills. Using the methods of EEG (Electroencephalogram) monitoring, scale questionnaireing and facial recognition technology, this study shows how different forms of nature education impact children's immediate physiological and psychological restorativeness with 35 child participants involved in direct, indirect and symbolic contact with nature for experiments. The study confirms that both direct and indirect contact with nature can enhance children's concentration and relaxation, with no significant difference between them. Both forms of contact with nature can improve positive emotions and alleviate negative emotions for children. However, special attention to the form of direct contact with nature is still warranted. The study also preliminarily explored the feasibility of using Google Vision facial recognition technology in nature education. All the research is dedicated to helping with the issues arising from children's "Nature-Deficit Disorder," promoting children's wellbeing, fostering sustainable and continuous protection of nature, and cultivating future citizens with a strong sense of social responsibility and good adaptive capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.