ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Psychometric properties of the Chinese Responsibility Scale in university students in Hong Kong, China.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This paper reports the development and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Chinese Responsibility Scale (CRS), which was designed to capture the multidimensional nature of responsibility in Chinese young people based on an integration of both Western and Chinese philosophies and conceptual models. Based on an integration of philosophical and scientific literature, we proposed a conceptual framework assessing responsibility across three dimensions: responsibility to oneself, family, and society. Methods: Study 1 was a content validation study conducted with an expert panel ( Results: The findings support different forms of validity, measurement invariance, and reliability of the CRS, demonstrating its suitability as an objective tool for evaluating self-reported responsibility among emerging adults in the Chinese cultural context. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.