ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Time course of postmortem procedures in a palliative care unit.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Japanese hospitals, the processes following recognition of absence of vital signs, including the pronouncement of death, postmortem care, handing over the body to the family or funeral service, and the final postmortem process, often require considerable time. With increasing attention being paid to physician work-hour management and workflow optimization in Japan, these tasks may represent a considerable burden. However, little is known about the actual time course from recognition of absence of vital signs to hospital discharge of the deceased. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients who died in our palliative care unit between September 2024 and March 2025. The primary objective was to evaluate the time intervals from pronouncement of death to the initiation of postmortem care, duration of postmortem care, and completion of the postmortem process. Results: Among the 85 patients discharged after death, time data were available for 81. Pronouncement of death was performed during regular working hours in 17 cases and outside working hours in 64 cases. The median interval from pronouncement of death by the physician to the initiation of postmortem care was 20 min, and the median duration of postmortem care was 40 min. The median time from pronouncement of death by the physician to the postmortem process was 129 min. Conclusions: These findings provide baseline quantitative data on the workflow burden associated with postmortem procedures in palliative care settings. Future studies should evaluate the operational burden and family-centered outcomes associated with postmortem procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.