SynthesisFrontiers in global women's health2026
Screening tools for maternal mental health in Africa: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maternal health during pregnancy and the postnatal period encompasses mental health, which is a key aspect in enhancing a positive outcome. Despite screening for other possible complications during pregnancy and the postnatal period, very little attention has been paid to screening for mental health. Screening is a key tool in early diagnosis and, eventually, timely diagnosis and management in cases where complications arise. Aim: This study aimed to assess the available maternal mental health screening tools and compare the outcome on their utilization during pregnancy and postnatal periods in the African continent. Methodology: This was a systematic review including articles published in Africa. It was registered on PROSPERO, ID CRD42024586869. The search databases were AJOL/PubMed/CINAHL, and studies published in English between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2024 were included. Grey literature was included. The MESH terms were Maternal mental illness OR Perinatal Mental illness OR Depression OR Anxiety OR Pregnant OR postnatal AND screening tools OR Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) OR Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), OR Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). To avoid risk of bias, the Cochrane risk of bias tool was utilized. Results: Most studies were cross-sectional ( Conclusion: Maternal mental health disorders remain highly prevalent across African settings yet are under-detected. The EPDS and SRQ-20 are the most validated and widely applied screening tools; however, gaps persist in service integration, provider training, and culturally sensitive screening. Embedding screening within routine maternal and child health care could bridge existing detection and treatment gaps. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024586869, CRD42024586869.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.