ArticleMedical physics2026
Gain correction for variable imaging geometry.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGain (flat-field) correction is a standard preprocessing step in X-ray imaging that compensates for detector fixed-pattern response, electronic offset, and spatial non-uniformity in incident fluence. Conventional correction relies on a geometry-matched air reference acquired at the same source-detector relative position as the clinical image. In variable-geometry systems, changes in source-detector distance (SDD) and relative source-detector rotation (SDR) alter the illumination field through inverse-square dilution and orientation-dependent anode heel shading, making geometry-matched reference acquisition impractical. PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a geometry-aware gain correction method that synthesizes a geometry-matched reference field from a compact calibration dataset and recorded acquisition geometry, enabling gain correction for variable geometry without geometry-matched reference acquisitions.
methodsThe measured signal was modeled as a function of the dark-current, detector response, geometry-dependent dilution, and a source fluence map that includes heel-effect gradients. Rigid transformations were used to map between the detector and source domains, for any acquisition geometry. Calibration consisted of a dark acquisition to estimate electronic offset, an air acquisition at a large SDD to estimate detector response, and a set of air images at a moderate SDD to construct a source fluence map. For each raw image, a geometry-specific synthetic reference was generated, followed by standard gain correction.
resultsSynthetic reference images closely matched measured air references. In air-only images, residual non-uniformity after correction remained below 0.5% of the mean signal, comparable to conventional matched-reference correction across varying SDDs and SDRs. In a chest phantom study, images corrected using synthetic and matched references demonstrated high agreement (multiscale structural similarity index = 0.995; Lin's concordance correlation coefficient = 0.999) with no visually structured residual artifacts.
conclusionsThe proposed synthetic-reference approach enables accurate gain correction under variable imaging geometry with performance comparable to conventional matched-reference methods, eliminating the need for geometry-specific air reference acquisitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.