ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
4D Flow MRI-Based Quantification of Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Possible Approach to Improve Measurement Repeatability.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo address limitations in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) quantification by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), a new method is proposed to directly quantify TR volume (TR
methodsThirty patients with TR were prospectively enrolled. TR
resultsThe dynamic 4D Flow method correlated strongly with all other MRI methods (r = 0.77-0.81, p < 0.0001) but consistently yielded higher TR
conclusion4D Flow with dynamic TV tracking offers a reproducible and potentially more sensitive method for TR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.