ArticleStem cell research & therapy2026
Regulatory mechanism of stem cell scaffold porosity and stiffness on the processes of intramembranous ossification and bone regeneration.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone defects remain a significant clinical challenge due to the limited regenerative capacity. Biomaterials can offer effective therapeutic approaches to address this challenge, where their physical properties play a critical role in determining the success of regeneration. Here, we fabricated cryogelated 3D porous scaffolds with independently controlled pore sizes and stiffness. These scaffolds were then seeded separately with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and MLO-A5 cells to create osteogenic cell-scaffold composites. To determine the optimal physical properties for promoting bone regeneration, we evaluated the scaffolds using both in vitro osteogenic cultures and a rat critical-sized calvarial defect model. Transcriptomic analysis was performed concurrently to explore the molecular link between physical scaffold cues and osteogenic differentiation. The results indicated that the small-pore high-stiffness scaffold exhibited the optimal osteogenic performance in vitro. In rats, the small pore scaffold groups also showed superior bone regeneration. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis revealed that scaffold pore size significantly changed the expression of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) and Osteoglycin (OGN). Our findings suggest a feasible strategy to enhance the efficiency of bone regeneration by leveraging the properties of tailored scaffolds, enabling personalized repair approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42426882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.